A Brief History of the Environmental Justice Movement Introduction "Environmental Justice" is a movement comprising Civil
Rights activists and environmentalists
working to ensure the rights of low-income and minority communities
to clean and healthy environments. Movements, often comprised of an
aggregate of issues and
events, are usually defined in singular moments--catalysts for momentum
towards comprehensive, cohesive action and response. The catalyst for the Environmental
Justice/Equity Movement had its beginnings
in a small, predominately African-American community in the South.
And while there had always been an awareness of the disproportionate
burden borne by minorities and low-income communities, events did
not give rise to a " movement " until 1982 in Warren County, North Carolina. Warren County, North Carolina In the early eighties, the State of North Carolina decided to build a toxic
waste landfill in an
overwhelmingly low-income and minority community in Warren County.
This landfill was created for the disposal of PCB-contaminated soil,
removed from fourteen counties throughout the State. Civil rights
and environmental activists collaborated to stage numerous demonstrations, which resulted
in the arrest of more than 500 people, including Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis,
Jr.--then Executive Director of the United Church of Christ Commission
for Racial Justice (and formerly the Executive Director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People), Dr. Joseph Lowery of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and Congressman Walter
Fauntroy (D- DC). Effect of the Warren County Protests; GAO Study Warren County became a rallying point for those eager to see national attention
focused on the inequities clearly present in the siting of unwanted
land uses. At the behest
of Congressman Walter Fauntroy, the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) conducted a study of the states
comprising Region IV (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) "to determine
the correlation between the location of
hazardous waste landfills and the racial and economic status
of the surrounding communities." The study's conclusions, while not surprising, were disheartening. The
report found that three out of every four landfills, in the EPA's
Region IV, were located near predominately minority communties. Commission on Racial Justice Report; Toxic Waste and Race In 1987, a milestone Commission on Racial Justice report showed that the
most significant factor in determining the siting of hazardous waste
facilities, nationwide, was race. The CRJ study found that three out
every five African-Americans or Hispanics live in a community buttressing
unregulated toxic waste sites. Additionally, the study noted that
African-Americans were heavily overrepresented in the populations
of metropolitan areas with the greatest number of uncontrolled toxic
waste sites. Results of other studies; race and economic considerations as factors
Other studies support the premise of race as a significant factor in the
siting of unwanted land uses; however, economic considerations also play
a role in the decision to site in predominately minority communites.
Oftentimes, poor communities are intentionally chosen to host undesirable
land uses simply because there is no expectation of resistance from
community residents and/or leaders. National Law Journal study; official response to EJ situations Following closely on the heels of C.R.J. Report, the National Law Journal conducted a study of its own
and found that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) took 20% longer to
place abandoned sites in minority communities on the national priority
action list and that polluters of those neighborhoods paid fines 54%
lower than polluters of white communities. Grassroots Activism Grassroots activists and community leaders have utilized the data developed
by environmental equity theorists, advocates, and sociologists to confront
corporate entities and inert and oftentimes ineffectual state and
federal agencies over unwanted sitings. Clinton Administration and Executive Order 12898 With the advent of a new administration, advocates have begun noting changes
in the law, as well as the overall reception given by government officials.
On February 11, 1994, President Clinton signed Executive Order 12898.
This "Order" directs each federal agency to develop an Environmental Justice strategy for "identifying and addressing... disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations."
Monies have been allocated to federal agencies and state governments
assisting communities develop strategies to local environmental problems. "Regulatory Reform" and Environmental Policy and Protection Rollbacks In the mid-1990's, the advent
of rising voter apathy, divisional politics, and a conservative Congress
resulted in stemming the tide of change in American Environmental Policies. Under
the guise of "regulatory reform," attempts were made to
rollback environmental protections developed in the last twenty years. Nonetheless, grassroots
organizers and local community activists were not stymied by these
developments. Throughout 1995 and 1996, community leaders, national
advocacy groups and environmentalists worked to prevent conservative
legislators from gutting existing environmental laws. Indeed, the very nation responded with a resounding
"NO" when offered a so-called "regulatory reform package"--an
unpalatable range of bills designed to decimate the very safeguards
which afford every American clean water and clean air. What can YOU do??? As is often the case, ALL must be vigilant in protecting the very basic
right to a clean and healthy environment. We--as individuals--cannot
rely on others to protect or secure our rights. The means by which
to ensure the continuation of environmental protections across the land is to stay informed. Knowledge
is POWER. Use the tools at your disposal--public libraries, newspapers,
public hearings--to learn about what is happening in your community.
Stay invloved in the PROCESS, let your voice be heard, make
your concerns known!!! SEE: U.S. General Accounting Office, Report, Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills
and Their Correlation With Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding
Communities, GAO/RCED-83-168, B-211461 (June 1, 1983). Jay M. Gould, Quality of Life in American Neighborhoods, Levels of Affluence, Toxic Waste, and Cancer Mortality
in Residential Zip Code Areas
(1986) United Church of Christ, Commission for Racial Justice, Toxic Wastes and
Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Communities
with Hazardous Waste Sites (1987). Robert D. Bullard, Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (1990) Benjamin A. Goldman, The Truth about Where You Live: An Atlas for Action
on Toxins and Mortality (1991). The National Law Journal, Special Issue: Unequal Protection: The Racial
Divide in Environmental Law, Sept. 21, 1992 Race and the Incidence of Environmental
Hazards: A Time for Discourse (Bunyan Bryant
& Paul Mohai eds. 1992). Rae Zimmerman, Social Equity and Environmental Risk, 13 Risk Anal.
649 (1993) Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots (Robert D. Bullard ed. 1993) Unequal Protection: Environmental
Justice and Communities of Color (Robert
D. Bullard ed. 1994) Timothy Noah, U.S. Rollback
of Green Agenda Is Stalled , Wall Street Journal, December 26, 1995, A8 GOP leaders rethinking their environmental strategy , Chemical Marketing
Reporter, February 12, 1996, pg 3 Mary Beth Regan, THE GOP'S
GUERRILLA WAR ON GREEN LAWS;
Newt & Co. plan a procedural overhaul, not a direct attack,
Business Week, December 12, 1994, pg 104 Cindy Skrzycki, Slowing the Flow Of Federal Rules; New Conservative Climate
Chills Agencies' Activism,
The Washington Post, February 18, 1996, A01. H. Josef Herbert, EPA Chief Denounces GOP Lawmakers' Ties to Industry Lobbyists,
Associated Press Pol. Serv., April 20, 1995. BACK TO THE E.J. CLINIC HOMEPAGE
Source: http://www.tsulaw.edu/environ/envhist.htm |