In situations where the environment cannot be privately owned,
access rights or user rights can be owned. David James, previously
Commissioner of the Resource Assessment Commission, says:
When factories, for example, dump organic waste into streams they
cause damage if their rights to use the assimilative capacity of
the resource are uncontrolled. The destruction of open-sea fisheries
through unrestricted harvesting, the pollution of beaches resulting
from sewage discharges, and land degradation resulting from overgrazing
and overcropping of marginal lands, are all examples of poorly defined
or allocated user rights. (1991, p.8)
Emissions trading is an alternative to pollution charges which
allows firms to trade the right to emit specific pollutants. The
only country where it is widely applied is in the USA, where it
is used for air pollution. In that case, it aims to achieve economic
efficiency rather than environmental effectiveness. That is, it
aims to achieve a given level of standards at less cost to industry,
and to enable continued economic growth despite restrictions on
increases in air pollution.
Tradeable pollution rights emerged in the USA when it was felt
that economic growth would be constrained by air quality laws enacted
as part of the Clean Air Act. Under these laws, maximum allowable
concentrations for specific air pollutants were set for each region.
The problem for regions which were already over the maximum allowable
concentrations (non-attainment areas) was how to achieve economic
growth when industrial growth was likely to add to the pollution
load and therefore would be illegal.
Back to Top...
|