The Pearce Argument
- sustainable development is non-declining
human welfare over time
- future should be compensated for damage done by
current generations
- compensation is best secured by leaving next
generation a stock of capital assets no less than we have
now
- capital assets = human-made and natural assets
- natural capital can be run down if human-made capital
can be substituted for it
- environment has to be valued in same way as
human-made assets
- if true value of environment were known we would not
degrade it as much
- for some environmental assets there is no question of
an acceptable trade-off
Source: David Pearce, ed, 1991, Blueprint 2: Greening the
World Economy, Earthscan, London.
Back...
|