Valuing the Environment

ArrowBack

DividerCase For Valuation

The Pearce Argument

  1. sustainable development is non-declining human welfare over time
  2. future should be compensated for damage done by current generations
  3. compensation is best secured by leaving next generation a stock of capital assets no less than we have now
  4. capital assets = human-made and natural assets
  5. natural capital can be run down if human-made capital can be substituted for it
  6. environment has to be valued in same way as human-made assets
  7. if true value of environment were known we would not degrade it as much
  8. for some environmental assets there is no question of an acceptable trade-off


Source: David Pearce, ed, 1991, Blueprint 2: Greening the World Economy, Earthscan, London.

Back...

Divider