Tim Boston
Alternatives Journal, Fall 1999 v25 i4 p42
Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism, Sharon Beder, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 1997.
The prevalence of terms like "environmental deregulation", "eco-freak", 
  "special interest group" and "environmental extremist" underscore 
  the spread of anti-environmental ideology over the past decade -- a period of 
  outright deception, prejudice and insensitivity towards nature on the part of 
  the powers that be. 
  Global Spin by Sharon Beder examines the current wave of anti-environmentalism. 
  Specifically, Beder reveals the deceptive and unethical underpinnings of the 
  "wise use" movement, industry front groups, contrarian think tanks, 
  multinational public relation firms, and media establishments. She argues that 
  anti-environmental groups often promote an elite, corporate agenda while posing 
  as public-interest groups. She also maintains that anti-environmentalists question 
  the existence of environmental problems, and consistently oppose rigorous environmental 
  regulations. 
  Global Spin offers convincing evidence that large corporate entities (particularly 
  multinational resource and chemical companies) are employing propaganda and 
  censorship (by avoiding, limiting and reinterpreting facts) in order to redefine 
  environmental problems, solutions and issues. Beder's overall thesis is that 
  there exists, in fact, an organized establishment of interests that consciously 
  seeks to subvert or dominate environmental debates and disengage environmental 
  concern. 
  Global Spin is a very worthwhile read, and should capture the attention of environmentalists 
  and social progressives of various stripes. Indeed, Beder's book dovetails with 
  such topics as prejudice and racism, anti-feminism, social stratification, industry-labour 
  conflict, and social control. It would make an excellent senior-level undergraduate 
  text. 
  I have only three small criticisms. First, Beder perceives free-market environmentalism 
  as an anti-environmental project. While it is possible to have reservations 
  about the effectiveness of market-based approaches to environmental problems, 
  it is inaccurate to associate a corporate assault against environmentalism with 
  those who legitimately seek to effect change (whether in full or in part) through 
  market mechanisms. With this said, there are so-called free-market environmentalists 
  who do not "walk their talk." They glowingly refer to the virtues 
  of market-based solutions to environmental problems, but fail to deliver greater 
  socio-environmental welfare through market mechanisms. Arguably, such hypocrisy 
  slips into the realm of anti-environmentalism. 
  Second, there is a gap in Beder's work. While she offers extensive detail on 
  Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs), she fails to discuss 
  the inner workings of anti-environmental legal foundations such as the Pacific 
  Legal Foundation or the U.S. National Legal Center for the Public Interest. 
  These groups are very often at the forefront of well organized campaigns to 
  promote anti-environmental laws, policies and actions. 
  Third, Beder speaks in generalities, using such words as "corporate" 
  or "industrial" loosely and pejoratively. Perhaps it is time to qualify 
  these words, acknowledge the complexity and differences among and within companies, 
  and ultimately recognize that some are making worthwhile attempts at reform. 
  By using these terms without qualification, environmentalists risk alienating 
  progressive and green business people, including those whose products line the 
  shelves of our neighbourhood health food stores. 
  Global Spin is a testament to the ever improving quality of research in the 
  field of anti-environmentalism. I have read many publications detailing the 
  spread of anti-environmentalism and can confidently say this is the best publication 
  on the topic to date. It is a well-researched, informative and bold critique 
  of the counter-movement against environmentalism. It also transcends the limitations 
  of elite, academic rhetoric: it is scholarly, yet accessible in style and tone. 
  Overall, it is a very solid, convincing and compelling piece of work. 
Timothy Boston is a PhD candidate in the Centre for Environmental Studies at the University of Tasmania, Australia.
Return to information about Global Spin