Peat mining
at Wingecarribee was argued to be unsustainable because it:
threatened
endangered plants and insects
rate
of mining far exceeded the rate of renewal of peat
peatlands
are fragile ecosystems
Threat
to endangered plants and insects:
According
to the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS):
Changes
in water regimes in the swamp as a result of milling potentially
also threaten the continued existence of the small populations of
endangered plants listed on Schedule I of the Threatened Species
Act, and if mining continued at increasing rates of extraction,
physical destruction of the populations could result within the
term of any renewed leases.
Emerald
Peat, who mined the peat at Wingecarribee, argued that two of
the endangered plants, the leek orchid and the gentian:
grow
in a narrow band on the margin of the swamp between the dryland
and wetland plant communities. Peat extraction will not occur
on the margins of the swamp. Operations will leave a buffer area
of at least 50 metres between extraction and the ecotone area
in which these plants may occur. Thus there will be no direct
effect by the mining on either of these plant species." The
only possible effect could be as a result of downdraw of water
from the ponds. However the downdraw effects are likely only for
a distance of 20 metres (Exhibit 112: Robertson), and hence both
species will be unaffected by the proposed future mining...
The
proposed minepath will clear about 700,000 individual Yellow Loosestrife
plants from a total of more than 6.3 million plants in Wingecarribee
Swamp....
Yellow
Loosestrife is common in the Northern Hemisphere and may have
been introduced into Australia by birds or Chinese herbalists
or their devotees (Exhibit 57: Robertson). The listing of this
species as a threatened native plant appears questionable at the
least.
Rate
of Mining Exceeded Rate of Renewal of Peat
The
NPWS argued that peat grows very slowly, around 10cm or 650 cu.m
per 100 years, whilst it is being mined at approximately 38000
cu m per year, which far exceeds the renewal rate. They claimed
that peat was not being regenerated at Wingecarribee at all because
of the mining activities.
The NPWS also recognises the potential for greatly
increased peat extraction capacity and the desire of the company
for an approximate 10 fold increase in production from the current
38000 tonne per annum (as stated by the company). This would
greatly exacerbate the degradation of the swamp ecosystems and
could result in all the stated extractable peat resources being
removed within the term of any renewed leases, if they were
a standard 21 year DMR lease.
However
Emerald Peat responded:
Peat
is being extracted from Wingecarribee Swamp at a faster rate than
it is being created there. That is a feature common with almost
all mining operations, such a coal, oil, iron and gold etc. If that
was the test of whether mining was permitted then there would be
virtually no mining in Australia. Such a proposition is a distortion
of the concept of ecologically sustainable development which is
a pattern of development that improves the total quality of life,
both now and in the future, in a way that maintains the ecological
processes upon which life depends.
And the
DMR argued:
Peat
is classified as a mineral, that is it is subject to the regime
set down for non-renewable resources. However peat is partially
renewable. World-wide it is generating much faster than it is being
utilised.
Peatlands
are fragile ecosystems
According
to Dr Geoffrey Hope, ANU:
[Swamps]
are fragile, representing an equilibrium between vegetation growth
and stream erosion which is easily disturbed by drainage, fire,
trampling or catchment clearance. These can lead to accelerating
gully development which can erode and de-water the entire peatland.
Emerald
Peat responded:
As there is only one operating peat mine in NSW, none of the numerous
other peat swamps are affected by mining, and all of these are potentially
available for conservation. Advice was given of a Department of
Mineral Resources policy to confine peat mining to Wingecarribee
swamp and not to issue mining leases over other peat swamps. The
fundamental issue is whether a balanced approach to conservation
and development is to permit one mining operation in part of one
swamp or whether balance is achieved by absolutely no mining of
any peat swamp anywhere in NSW.
References:
National
Parks and Wildlife Service, Submission to the Mining Wardens Inquiry
into Possible Renewal of Mining Leases for the Extraction of Peat
from Wingecarribee Swamp, 1997, Exhibit 23, pp. 8-12.
Geoffrey
Hope, Senior Fellow, ANU, Submission to the Mining Wardens Inquiry
into Possible Renewal of Mining Leases for the Extraction of Peat
from Wingecarribee Swamp, 1997, Exhibit 34.
Minter
Ellison, Summary of Submissions by Emerald Peat Pty Ltd, 1997.
Department
of Mineral Resources, Submission to Inquiry into Renewal of Mining
leases 567 and 568 at Wingecarribee Swamp, 1997.
|