Direct
Values
Productive
use value
Consumption
use value
Indirect Values
Non-consumptive
use value
Option
value
Existence
value
The reasons for preventing losses of species, and maintaining
ecosystems and biodiversity, are many and wide-ranging: the social,
ethical, aesthetic and cultural values of plants and animals have
been recognised in religion, art, and literature throughout history.
For many people, the value of biological diversity is self-evident,
and to attempt to quantify that value only demeans it. However,
some nature conservation groups argue that it is necessary to
demonstrate the economic worth of biodiversity so as to influence
decision-makers and to compete with those offering economic benefits
from the exploitation of biological resources.
The reasons for preventing losses of species, and maintaining
ecosystems and biodiversity, are many and wide-ranging: the social,
ethical, aesthetic and cultural values of plants and animals have
been recognised in religion, art, and literature throughout history.
For many people, the value of biological diversity is self-evident,
and to attempt to quantify that value only demeans it. However,
some nature conservation groups argue that it is necessary to
demonstrate the economic worth of biodiversity so as to influence
decision-makers and to compete with those offering economic benefits
from the exploitation of biological resources.
Back to Top...
Productive use value
This is the value of products that are bought and sold on the
market, such as timber, fish, animal skins, fruits, etc. Usually,
these values are the only ones that count as part of GNP; and
then only when they are removed from the ecosystem. Additionally,
wild species contribute to the production of food and other goods
in indirect ways by improving existing varieties or by providing
the source of genes for breeding new varieties. They are also
useful as forage for livestock production, as pollinators for
crops, and as predators for crop pests. In a 1986 study, Prescott-Allen
and Prescott-Allen estimated that wild species of plants and animals
have made a contribution to the value of 4.5 per cent of GDP in
the USA and a much higher percentage in developing countries.
Back to Top...
Consumption use value
This refers to products that are used by people but are not bought
or sold on the market. This might include firewood or food collected
in a forest but not paid for. Such values are not included in
measures of GNP but they are not insignificant. It is estimated
that wildlife-related recreational activities provide Canadians
with $800 million of benefits every year, and that firewood and
dung provide more than 90 per cent of primary energy needs in
Nepal, Tanzania and Malawi. These values could be assigned a monetary
value by estimating how much these goods would cost on the market.
Back to Top...
Non-consumptive use value
Plants and animals can also be useful without being used up or
consumed; for example, for scientific research or bird-watching
or bush-walking. Perhaps more importantly, biological resources
perform environmental services which are essential for the healthy
functioning of an ecosystem. Non-consumptive benefits might include:
- photosynthetic fixation of solar energy, transferring this
energy through green plants into natural food chains, and thereby
providing the support system for species that are harvested;
- ecosystem functions involving reproduction, including pollination,
gene flow, cross-fertilization; maintenance of environmental
forces and species that influence the acquisition of useful
genetic traits in economic species; and maintenance of evolutionary
processes, leading to constant dynamic tension among competitors
in ecosystems;
- maintaining water cycles, including recharging groundwater
protecting watersheds and buffering extreme water conditions
(such as flood and drought);
- regulation of climate, at both macro- and micro-climatic levels
(including influences on temperature, precipitation, and air
turbulence);
- soil production and protection of soil from erosion, including
protecting coastlines from erosion by the sea;
- storage and cycling of essential nutrients; for example, carbon,
nitrogen, and oxygen and maintenance of the oxygen&endash;carbon
dioxide balance;
- absorption and breakdown of pollutants, including the decomposition
of organic wastes, pesticides, and air and water pollutants;
and
- provision of the recreational; aesthetic, sociocultural, scientific,
educational, spiritual, and historical values of natural environments.
Back to Top...
Option value
This is the value of keeping species or ecosystems in case they
might be useful in the future. Most species on the planet have
not been identified or characterised by scientists. Since a few
known species have provided so many products that are beneficial,
it is reasonable to assume that some of the unknown ones might
do so in the future. Also, because technology and scientific knowledge
is constantly changing, it is also probable that known species
might provide uses that have not yet been thought of. Moreover,
since the future is uncertain, it is better to keep our options
open: we do not know now what we might need later. 'The best preparation
in the context of wildlife use is to have a safety net of diversity.'
Another future dimension of value to consider is that demand
for natural resources is likely to grow as species become extinct
or rare. This will ensure that their value increases due to scarcity.
Back to Top...
Existence value
This category recognises that people place a value on the existence
of a species or ecosystems even if they have no use for it themselves
and may never even visit it. They just like to know that it is
there. It has been suggested that whilst it would be impossible
to measure this value accurately, contributions to conservation
groups who aim to preserve such species or ecosystems may be an
indicator of concern.
Source: McNeely et al, 1990.
Back to Top...