The journalistic tendency to balance
stories with two opposing views leads to a tendency to "build
stories around a confrontation between protagonists and antagonists."
(Ricci 1993, p. 95) Issues such as garbage and sewage sludge only
get coverage, despite their importance, when there is a fight
over the siting of a landfill or incinerator and then the coverage
is on the "anger and anguish of affected citizens, or the conflicting
claims of corporate spokesmen, government regulators and environmental
activists" rather than the issues and technical background to
them. A survey commissioned by the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers of media coverage in the US in 1991 found that independent
experts were seldom used as sources: "The news was not oriented
toward describing or explaining the problem, but rather toward
disputes over what should be done about it." (Gersh 1992)
In one story by ABC's Nightline,
for example, Nebraskan residents opposing a 'low-level' radioactive
waste dump in their neighbourhood, attempted to present, with
the help of an EPA expert Hugh Kaufman, rational arguments involving
discussion of various technical issues. However, according to
Kaufman, the TV crew wanted emotional material and in the end
used archive footage of heated meetings to get the emotional content
they wanted:
They defined the issue
this way: The public are a bunch of emotional misfits who think
about Chernobyl and aren't doing their homework, while proponents
are these brilliant technical experts. In other words they walked
in with a predetermined story when, in fact, what they had seen
in Nebraska was just the opposite. (Russell 1990, p. 5)
This is a feature of many news
stories about local controversies. The intelligence and research
of local residents is downplayed and they are presented as passionate,
self-interested and inexpert. This tends to discourage wider support
for their cause from the viewing public and to disempower other
citizens by depriving them of attractive models of political activism.
...back
to top
References:
Gersh,
Debra, 1992, Covering
solid waste issues,
Editor & Publisher, Vol. 125, No. August 29.
Ricci, David, 1993, The Transformation
of American Politics: The New Washington and the Rise of Think
Tanks (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Russell, Dick, 1990, 'EPA Official
Accuses Nightline of Distortions', Lies of Our Times, June,
p. 5.