Business-Managed Democracy

• Introduction

• Green Consumerism

• Public Relations

• Front Groups

• Wise Use Movement

• Think Tanks
• Examples
  • CEI
  • Cato Institute
  • Inst. of Public Affairs
  • IEA
• Casting Doubt
  • Ozone Depletion
  • Steven Milloy
  • Roger Bate
  • Ronald Bailey
  • Recycling
• Attacking Opponents
  • Env. as a Religion
  • Undue Influence
  • Watching NGOs
• Attacking Regulation
  • Job Creation Act
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Data Quality Act
  • Takings
• Market Solutions
  • Official Rationale
  • Promoting the Market
  • Property Rights
• References

• Global Warming

• SLAPPs

• Media

• Environmentalists


 

site search by freefind	advanced

---

Business-Managed Environment

Attacking Environmentalists

Most of the conservative think tanks attack environmentalism in some way and have provided a key role in inspiring and galvanising anti-environmentalist sentiments. They do this because environmentalists seek government regulation to protect the environment whilst conservative think tanks oppose most government regulation and because conservative think tanks believe environmental groups support an anti-business, anti-free market agenda.

Moreover, in order to downplay environmental problems (see casting doubt) think tanks "portray environmentalists as 'radicals' who distort evidence and exaggerate problems". Environmentalists are also portrayed as being opposed to progress and threatening economic prosperity and comfortable lifestyles. Various think tanks have also claimed that environmentalists have been responsible for millions of malaria deaths in the developed world because of their opposition to DDT.

In its journal, Policy Review, the Heritage Foundation has labelled the environmental movement as “the greatest single threat to the American economy”. Cato Institute books include:

• Apocalypse Not, which argues that “much of the environmental movement is a broad-based assault on reason” and freedom;
• Ecoscam: The False Prophets of Ecological Apocalypse in which Ronald Bailey criticises environmentalists for “their faulty analyses, their wildly inaccurate predictions, their heedless politicization of science, their opportunism, and their courtship of the media”.

In 2007 the Cato Institute held a forum entitled "Do NGOs Harm Growth in the Developing World?" which clearly argued that they do by advocating anti-growth policies.

Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) NGO Watch Project, Don D'Cruz (pictured) attacked Malaysian NGOs — Consumers' Association of Penang (CAP) and the Third World Network (TWN), who were opposing genetically-engineered crops, as being 'local front organisations' for American environmentalists because some of their funding cam from a US environment group.

Jennifer Marohasy, when she was director of the IPA's environmental unit, argued that "The tangible environmental benefits of GM are being ignored because it seems that Greens hate technology more than they care about the environment" and that the opposition of environmentalists to GM crops was "a clear illustration of their narrow and backward-looking approach to environmental protection".